Skip to content

Source Verification: The Rape of the Sabine Women

Every claim below is either what a named ancient source attests, in its own line or section, or a point where the sources themselves disagree.

What the Sources Attest

What was the abduction of the Sabine women?

It is the Roman legend that Romulus's new city, refused wives by its neighbours, seized young women from the guests at the Consualia games. Plutarch dates it to 18 August and Dionysius counts 683 women. The sources say marriage, not killing, was the aim. The women's own intervention later ended the war that followed.

Source: Plutarch, Life of Romulus 15

Why did the Romans kidnap the Sabine women?

Because no neighbour would let its daughters marry Romans. Livy says the envoys Romulus sent were refused intermarriage and mocked, so he planned the seizure at a festival. Other writers give other motives. Plutarch mentions a view that Romulus wanted war, and Dionysius lists a scarcity of women, a pretext for war and an alliance by kinship, preferring the last.

Source: Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.31

Did Rome conquer the Sabines?

Not in the legend. Romulus beat Caenina, Antemnae and Crustumerium, but the war with Tatius's Sabines ended when the women stopped the fighting. Livy says the two nations became one state under two kings with the seat of government at Rome, and the Romans took the name Quirites. Dionysius says the kings had equal authority.

Source: Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.13

What were the Sabines known for?

Within the legend, for being numerous and warlike. Plutarch says they lived in unwalled villages and thought themselves bold because they descended from Spartan colonists. Dionysius records the same Spartan tradition and says it explains their fondness for war, their frugality and their severity. Livy adds that Rome took the name Quirites from their old capital Cures.

Source: Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.49

What is the meaning behind the painting The Intervention of the Sabine Women?

David painted it in 1799, and it hangs in the Louvre. It shows Hersilia placing her children between her husband Romulus and her father Tatius. Wikipedia's summary says David began it in prison after the Terror and that it was read as a plea for reconciliation after the Revolution. The scene follows Livy's account of the women ending the battle.

Source: Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.13

Where Accounts Differ

  • motive-of-the-abduction
  • number-of-women
  • date-of-the-abduction
  • god-of-the-games
  • the-first-enemy
  • tarpeia-motive-and-fate
  • who-arranged-the-intervention
  • hersilia-status
  • honours-to-the-women
  • end-of-the-joint-rule
  • framing-of-consent
  • The motive is disputed. Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.9, gives necessity: no wives and no right of intermarriage. Plutarch, Life of Romulus 14, reports a view that Romulus wanted war and took only thirty women, and rejects it as unlikely. Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.31.1, lists a scarcity of women, a pretext for war and alliance by kinship, and prefers the last.
  • The number of women differs. Plutarch, Life of Romulus 14, gives thirty, 527 (Valerius Antias) and 683 (Juba). Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.30.6, counts 683, and at 2.47.4 gives Varro's 527 as the women who went on the embassy, not the women seized.
  • The date differs. Plutarch, Life of Romulus 14, says the fourth month after the founding, following Fabius, and names 18 August, the Consualia, at 15. Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.31.1, says some place it in Romulus's first year and Gnaeus Gellius in the fourth, which he thinks likelier.
  • The god of the games is uncertain. Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.9, says Equestrian Neptune. Plutarch, Life of Romulus 14, says Consus, god of counsel or an equestrian Neptune. Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.31.2-3, gives Consus as an earth-god or a hidden divinity of counsels, and says the truth is hard to tell.
  • The first enemy is told differently. Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.10, has the Caeninenses raid Roman land and Romulus kill their unnamed king in the fighting. Plutarch, Life of Romulus 16, names the king Acron and has the two leaders fight a single combat. Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.33, has Romulus kill the king as he meets the Caeninenses.
  • Tarpeia's motive and fate are disputed. Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.11, gives bribery and two versions of her price, gold or shields, and two reasons for her death. Plutarch, Life of Romulus 17, adds that some make her the daughter of Tatius acting at his command, and that Simylus makes her betray Rome to the Gauls. Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.38-2.40, records Lucius Piso's version, in which she meant to disarm the Sabines.
  • Who arranged the women's intervention differs. Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.13, gives it as a spontaneous act. Plutarch, Life of Romulus 19, and Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.45, name Hersilia as the leader, and Dionysius has the senate approve the embassy. Ovid, Fasti 3.205-228, has the women meet in Juno's temple on a daughter-in-law of Mars's advice.
  • Hersilia's status differs. Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.11, calls her Romulus's wife. Plutarch, Life of Romulus 14, says she was the one married woman taken, wife of Hostilius or, in other accounts, of Romulus. Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.45.2, says some make her a married woman seized as a virgin, but the more probable account is that she stayed of her own free will with her daughter.
  • The honours to the women are disputed. Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.13, says the curiae took their names from the women and admits tradition is silent on how they were chosen. Plutarch, Life of Romulus 20, calls that false, since many curiae bear place names. Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.47.3-4, reports both views, with Varro against.
  • The end of the joint rule differs. Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.14, has Tatius killed at Lavinium after his kinsmen ill-treated Laurentine envoys. Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.50.4, says the kings reigned together five years first, and at 2.52 gives two versions of the killing.
  • The ancient accounts frame the abduction as a route to marriage and record the women's persuasion. Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.9, says the women were despondent and indignant until Romulus reasoned with them, and Dionysius, Roman Antiquities 2.30.5, says he told them it was for marriage. The consent this implies is the historians' claim, not the women's. This page reports the framing and does not endorse it.

Sources

Primary sources
  • Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.9
  • Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.10
  • Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.11
  • Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.12
  • Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.13
  • Livy, Ab Urbe Condita 1.14
  • Plutarch, Life of Romulus 14
  • Plutarch, Life of Romulus 15
  • Plutarch, Life of Romulus 16
  • Plutarch, Life of Romulus 17
  • Plutarch, Life of Romulus 18
  • Plutarch, Life of Romulus 19
  • Plutarch, Life of Romulus 20
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.30
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.31
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.33
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.35-2.36
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.38-2.40
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.41-2.43
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.45
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.46
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.47
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.49
  • Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.50
  • Ovid, Fasti 3.195-199
  • Ovid, Fasti 3.205-228
Further reading
  • Wikipedia, The Intervention of the Sabine Women (year, exhibition, prison origin and political reading; read 2026-09-29)